One of the first steps in the application’s modernization journey is to split the monoliths into its micro-service portfolio. The central feature of a monolith as a single insert can also help reduce design failures, such as closed clutch or lack of internal structure. A distributed monolith is a multi-service system, but for whatever reason the entire system must be implemented together. A distributed monolith can meet the definition of a service-oriented architecture, but too often it does not keep the STD promises. In my experience, distributed monoliths have all the drawbacks of a distributed system and the drawbacks of a single-process monolith, without having enough benefits from either.
1 There is too much technical snobbery in some piles of technology that can unfortunately border on contempt for people who work with certain tools.2 Don’t be part of the problem! Choose the approach that works for you and change strategies for decomposing monoliths things to tackle problems when you see them. Our business domain becomes the main force behind the architecture of our system, hoping to facilitate change and facilitate the organization of our teams in our business domain.
If we want to facilitate change, we need to change the way we group the code: we choose the coherence of business functionality rather than technology. Each service may or may not contain a combination of these three layers, but that is a concern for the implementation of local services. If your business idea is fresh and you want to validate it, you must start with a monolith. With a small engineering team that wants to develop a simple and lightweight application, it is not necessary to implement microservices. In this way, a monolithic application will be much easier to build, make changes, implement and prove. Another advantage of the microservices approach is that each element can be scaled independently.
But components written in languages other than JVM have no place in their monolithic architecture. If your application uses a platform frame that later becomes obsolete, it can also be difficult to gradually migrate the application to a newer and better frame. To use a newer platform framework, you may need to rewrite the entire application, which is a risky task. To avoid this, you can use decomposition patterns to break down monolithic applications, convert them into multiple microservices and migrate them to a microservice architecture. We also recommend that you fully understand the case of commercial use, technology and the interdependencies of monoliths with other applications.
Finally, you will find that adding new features or building new user experiences becomes difficult as your business grows or the number of users increases. This solution usually includes a client-side user interface, a server-side application and a database. It is unified and all functions are managed and operated in one place. It requires a long-term commitment to a stack of technology: monolithic architecture forces you to marry the stack of technology you chose at the beginning of development . With a monolithic application it can be difficult to gradually apply a newer technology. It has a number of language options because in addition to Java you can also use other JVM languages that work well with Java, such as Groovy and Scala.
First, all services can be independently implemented and updated, providing more flexibility. Second, a microservice error only affects a particular service and does not affect the entire application. It is also much easier to add new functions to a microservice application than a monolithic one. Rather, the monolithic approach is a standard model for creating a software application. The large monolithic code base intimidates developers, especially those new to the team. Because there are no hard module limits, modularity breaks over time.
Therefore, the whole process over time is more cost effective and effective than monoliths when the whole application needs to be scaled even when not needed. In addition, each monolith has scalability limits, so the more users you get, the more problems you will have with your monolith. That is why many companies are rebuilding their monolithic architectures. Within a microservice architecture, all functionality is divided into independently implementable modules that communicate with each other using defined methods called APIs . Each service has its own scope and can be independently updated, implemented and scaled.